Lime Rock Bank v. Macomber
Lime Rock Bank v. Macomber
29 Me. 564
Lime Rock Bank v. Macomber
Opinion of the Court
The ComtT, by
orally.
Formerly the assent of the bank, in such a case, was required to be proved by record. More recently the consent of its officers has been held sufficient. The jury were justified in finding such consent. A suit in the name of the United States was recently maintained by direction of the Postmaster General, for the benefit of an individual. Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.