Pierce v. Stevens
Pierce v. Stevens
30 Me. 184
Pierce v. Stevens
Opinion of the Court
— Without any stipulation to the contrary, a mortgagee of either real or personal estate is entitled to immediate possession. But the parties may legally contract that the possession may remain with the mortgager. As to personal property, such an agreement does not contradict the
Exceptions sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.