Pingree v. County Commissioners
Pingree v. County Commissioners
Opinion of the Court
The petitioners are owners of land in township numbered four, Penobscot county, and not within the limits of any organized plantation, or incorporated town. The highway in question, was located over a portion of their land, and through the adjacent towns of Lincoln and Lee, then incorporated.
Two errors are assigned as reasons for granting a writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings of the County Commissioners, in reference to the location.
1. That no such notice was given to the petitioners, of the pendency of the petition, for the location of the highway, as is required by law; and that it did not appear by the records of the County Commissioners, whether the owners of the township were known or unknown.
2. That the County Commissioners did not decide whether the township, or any part of it, was enhanced in value by the location of such highway.
A consideration of the first error assigned, does not become material to the disposition of this case, in the view we take of the matter embraced by the second.
By the Rev. Stat. c. 25, § 44, County Commissioners are authorized to lay out highways, “ in or through any tract, township or plantation,” other than towns or organized plantations. “ And the same shall be done at the expense of thé proprietors of .said tract, township or plantation, or of the county, or partly at the expense of each, as said Court shall order. AH the proprietors of such tracts of land, townships or plantations, last mentioned, shall be held to pay their proportion, according to their interest, of all costs and expenses of making and repairing the ways aforesaid.” By other provisions of the same chapter, the County Commissioners are authorized to apportion
Viewing all these provisions together, it is apparent that it was the intention to require necessary ways to be made through the lands in unincorporated places, at the expense of the proprietors, wholly, or in part, if the County Commissioners should so determine ; although the lands should not be particularly benefited by the way ; and lo compel those, whose lands were particularly benefited, to pay more than others, according to the value of the land, and the benefits likely to result from the establishment of the way.
All proprietors in such unincorporated places, as well as the county in which they are located, would be interested that the County Commissioners should decide, at whose expense the way should be made, and whether, in their opinion, any portion of the tract would be enhanced in value; as such decision would determine the extent of the respective liabilities, for constructing the way, and might materially affect the price and value of the “ divisions, or separate ownerships.” Hence, the statute requires, absolutely, that they shall make such decision, whenever they shall lay out such way.
Upon looking into the record of the County Commissioners, we perceive that they did not comply with the requirements of the 47th section of the statute referred to, in any respect, in
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.