Mixer v. Cook
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Arnold v. Gambrel (Okla. 1917)
- Wadhams v. Balfour (Or. 1898)
- Rumford Chemical Works v. Finnie (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee 1879)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The jury have found that there was á sale by the plaintiffs to Kimball & Coburn, and that the stipulation for payment on delivery was waived by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs’ property in the starch had, therefore, ceased.
If they had prosecuted the suit against Kimball & Coburn, in which they attached the starch, proof of fraud between the defendant and Kimball & Coburn, might have availed the plaintiffs. But they do not now claim as creditors.
Judgment on the verdict.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.