Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1850

State v. Cunningham

State v. Cunningham
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided July 1, 1850 · Orally, Shepley
31 Me. 355
State v. Cunningham

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Shepley, C. J., orally.

There is no positive rule of law, that a jury may not convict upon the unsupported testimony of a particeps criminis. There may be cases, hr which an -omission, by the- Judge, to advise the jury to look with great .suspicion, on such testimony, might be deemed a neglect of duty. Each case has its peculiar circumstances, with reference ■to which the Judge should exercise a sound discretion, in advising the jury.

This case being put upon strict legal right, the

Exceptions are overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.