Paine v. McIntire

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Paine v. McIntire, 32 Me. 131 (Me. 1850)
Howard

Paine v. McIntire

Opinion of the Court

Howard, J.

By the common law, an administrator de bonis non cannot execute a judgment recovered by a former executor, or administrator, but may maintain a new action. Snape v. Norgate, Cro. Car. 167; Yaites v. Gough, Yelv. 83; Barnhurst, Yelv. 83; Ket v. Life, Yelv. 125; Turner v. Davies, 2 Saund. 149; Grout v. Chamberlain, 4 Mass. 611, 613; Dale v. Roosevelt, 8 Cowen, 333.

In England the law has been changed by an act of parliament, 17 Car. 2, c. 8; but here the modification has been made by our own statutes, 1821, c. 52, § 20; R. S. c. 120, § 8. These statutes furnish a remedy for the administrator de bonis non by scire facias only, on a judgment rendered for a prior administrator. He may pursue that remedy, but cannot maintain an action of debt on such judgment, under existing laws. Plaintiff nonsuit.

Reference

Full Case Name
Paine, Adm'r, versus McIntire
Status
Published