George v. Nichols

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
George v. Nichols, 32 Me. 179 (Me. 1850)
Tenney

George v. Nichols

Opinion of the Court

Tenney, J.,

orally.—The first objection was obviated by the defendant’s attendance at the taking.

It is not requisite that the magistrate should be a commissioner. It does not appear that he was not authorized by *180the laws of his State to take depositions. Depositions taken out of the State may be received at the discretion of the court. R. S. c. 133, § 22. Exceptions overruled.

Reference

Full Case Name
George versus Nichols
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published