Dickey v. Franklin Bank
Dickey v. Franklin Bank
32 Me. 572
Dickey v. Franklin Bank
Opinion of the Court
orally.—The cashier had no author^ to receive the note for the bank, except by allowing it on the note A. This was not done, and it never became the property of the bank. The bank had the note in possession ; claimed to own it, and attempted to apply it to their own benefit by a set-off against a debt due from themselves. This constituted a conversion. Judgment for plaintiff.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.