Atkinson v. Snow

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Atkinson v. Snow, 33 Me. 579 (Me. 1851)
Howard, Orally

Atkinson v. Snow

Opinion of the Court

Howard, J., orally.

— The record had been read, and was present for the use of either party. It was the same with the advertisement in the newspaper. It was, therefore, immaterial upon which paper the counsel was looking, when he read the advertisement to the jury. It might have been so done, merely for convenience.

*580To that convenience the Judge might properly assent. The exception was without foundation, and must be overruled.

Reference

Full Case Name
Atkinson versus Snow
Status
Published