Evans v. Smith

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Evans v. Smith, 34 Me. 33 (Me. 1852)
Howard

Evans v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Howard, J.,

orally. —There is no valid objection to the admissibility of the Avitness. It is not a sound principle that, in order to take a note from the operation of the statute, the indorsement must be made in the handwriting of the debtor. It is the fact of the part-payment within six years from the commencement of the suit, which has that effect. Such a payment is distinctly shown by the testimony, Avhich it is admitted William Evans would give. Defendant defaulted.

Reference

Full Case Name
Daniel Evans versus Smith
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published