Evans v. Smith
Evans v. Smith
34 Me. 33
Evans v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
orally. —There is no valid objection to the admissibility of the Avitness. It is not a sound principle that, in order to take a note from the operation of the statute, the indorsement must be made in the handwriting of the debtor. It is the fact of the part-payment within six years from the commencement of the suit, which has that effect. Such a payment is distinctly shown by the testimony, Avhich it is admitted William Evans would give. Defendant defaulted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.