Murphy v. Glidden
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Murphy v. Glidden, 34 Me. 196 (Me. 1852)
Tenney
Murphy v. Glidden
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court, Shepley, C. J., Tenney, Howard and Appleton, J. J., was delivered by
orally. —It is urged, by the respondent’s counsel, that exceptions do not lie to the decision of the Judge
The fact of the complainant’s constancy or inconstancy to the accusation against the respondent not appearing to have been decided, we are left to an examination of the evidence. The burden of proving the inconstancy is upon the respondent, and we think the evidence does not satisfactorily prove it. Exceptions sustained.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Murphy, versus Glidden
- Status
- Published