Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1856

Lumberman's Bank v. Bearce

Lumberman's Bank v. Bearce
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided July 1, 1856 · Appleton, Goodenow, Hathaway, Tenney
41 Me. 505

Lumberman's Bank v. Bearce

Opinion of the Court

Goodenow, J.

There is no foundation for exceptions to the instructions of the presiding Judge to the jury.

The damages in this case were not reduced by the oath of the defendant. The plaintiffs are entitled to judgment on the verdict, and their costs.

The defendant is not entitled to costs.

Exceptions overruled.

Tenney, C. J., and Hathaway, Appleton, and May, J. J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.