Lumberman's Bank v. Bearce

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Lumberman's Bank v. Bearce, 41 Me. 505 (Me. 1856)
Appleton, Goodenow, Hathaway, Tenney

Lumberman's Bank v. Bearce

Opinion of the Court

Goodenow, J.

There is no foundation for exceptions to the instructions of the presiding Judge to the jury.

The damages in this case were not reduced by the oath of the defendant. The plaintiffs are entitled to judgment on the verdict, and their costs.

The defendant is not entitled to costs.

Exceptions overruled.

Tenney, C. J., and Hathaway, Appleton, and May, J. J., concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Lumberman's Bank versus Samuel R. Bearce
Status
Published