Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1858

Jordan v. McKenney

Jordan v. McKenney
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided July 1, 1858 · Cutting, Davis, Hathaway, Tenney
45 Me. 306

Jordan v. McKenney

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Davis, J.

The condition of the recognizance required in case of an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, was, by the statute of 1821, to pay all intervening damages and costs; by the statute of 1841, to pay the costs only.

The recognizance in this case, was taken under the statute of 1841; and the condition was β€œto pay all intervening damages and costs.” This, not being such a recognizance as the statute required, was void. The magistrate had no right to require it; as it was void, it furnished no security to the ad*307verse party; and the appeal was improperly allowed. French v. Snell, 37 Maine, 100. The exceptions are sustained; the verdict must be set aside, and the appeal dismissed.

Tenney, O. J., Hathaway, Cutting, and May, J. J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.