Wood v. Holden

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Wood v. Holden, 45 Me. 374 (Me. 1858)
Cutting, Davis, Goodenow, Hathaway, Tenney

Wood v. Holden

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Tenney, C. J.

The parties, in legal form, “ agreed to submit the demand with the cause of action set forth in the writ, hereto annexed, to,” &c. The action is trespass, and the writ makes a part of the case. The claim is shown clearly by the declaration in the writ, and the words upon the back thereof, “from the office of Yirgin & Dunnell,” is a sufficient signing of the claim in behalf of the plaintiff. R. S. of 1841, c. 138, § § 2 and 4. Exceptions overruled.

Hathaway, Cutting, May, Goodenow, and Davis, J. J., concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ephraim S. Wood versus David R. Holden
Status
Published