Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1859

Mansur v. Keaton

Mansur v. Keaton
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided July 1, 1859 · Appleton, Cutting, Davis, Kent, Tenney
46 Me. 346
Mansur v. Keaton

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Davis, J.

The facts proved, and offered to be proved, do not constitute a consummated payment, or accord and satisfaction. The plaintiff having neglected or declined to carry out the arrangement, the Staekpole execution is still the property of the defendant. Exceptions overruled.

Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, and Kent, J. J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.