Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1865

Crooker v. Randall

Crooker v. Randall
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided July 1, 1865 · Appleton, Cutting, Danforth, Dickerson, Walton
53 Me. 355

Crooker v. Randall

Opinion of the Court

Dickerson, J.

The facts admitted by the demurrer *356would not authorize the rejection of the report of the referee; a fortiori, the Court will not grant a review. The "mistake” alleged was the fault of the petitioner’s counsel,- which the Court will not cure.

It does not appear that the newly discovered evidence is admissible, or that it is not cumulative; nor is the Court furnished with the whole evidence before the referee, to enable it to determine whéther the evidence is cumulative.

Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Cutting, Walton and Danforth, JJ., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.