Crooker v. Randall
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Crooker v. Randall, 53 Me. 355 (Me. 1865)
Appleton, Cutting, Danforth, Dickerson, Walton
Crooker v. Randall
Opinion of the Court
The facts admitted by the demurrer
It does not appear that the newly discovered evidence is admissible, or that it is not cumulative; nor is the Court furnished with the whole evidence before the referee, to enable it to determine whéther the evidence is cumulative.
Exceptions overruled.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Charles Crooker, versus Elbridge Randall
- Status
- Published