State v. Grand Trunk Railway of Canada
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Cummings v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine 1876)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
By E. S. 1857, c. 51, § 46, “no engine or train is to be run across a highway near the compact part of a town, at a greater speed than six miles an hour. Nor is any way to be unreasonably and negligently obstructed by engines, tenders, or cars. The corporation forfeits not exceeding one hundred dollars for every offense.”
The defendant corporation has been indicted for and found guilty of unreasonably and negligently obstructing a certain highway in the town of Falmouth.
The main objection taken in arrest of judgment is that an indictment does not lie, and that the only mode of redress or punishment is by an action of debt for the penalty given by the statute.
The unreasonably and negligently obstructing a highway by
Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.