Elder v. Miller
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Chase v. Wilcox (District Court, D. Maine 1927)
- Rudisell v. Jennings (Ind. Ct. App. 1906)
- Alferitz v. Ingalls (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada 1897)
- Rawlins v. T. P. Kennard & Son (Neb. 1889)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an action of trover for two horses. The plaintiffs claim under a mortgage from Jordan & Rice, dated Dec. 3, 1870, and duly recorded.
The defendant claims as a purchaser of the horses in controversy subsequently to the recording of the mortgage.
Jordan & Rice, at the time of giving the mortgage to the plaintiff, were keeping a livery stable. The mortgagors describe the stable, the property mortgaged, as carriages, phaetons, eight horses, etc., ‘ the said property being the same now in said building or stable.’
The cases are numerous in this State in which descriptions like that in the mortgage under consideration have been sustained. Chapin v. Crane, 40 Maine, 561; Skowhegan Bank v. Farrar, 46 Maine, 293.
The evidence to show that the horses in controversy were owned by the mortgagors at the time of the mortgage, and were then in the stable, and embraced within the mortgage, was properly received. . Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.