Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1873

State v. Pettis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided July 1, 1873 · Admissible, Appleton, Barrows, Dalton, Daneorth, Declarations, Dickerson, Evidence, Intent, Peters, Point, Property, Shown, Tending, That, Thought, Walton, Yirgin

63 Me. 124

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Kimball (Me. 1976)
State v. Small (Me. 1960)
State v. Cohen (Minn. 1935)
State v. Childers (Or. 1914)
State v. White (Vt. 1905)
People v. Tomlinson (Cal. 1894)
People v. Tomlinson (Cal. 1894)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Dickerson, J.

It is not competent for a person charged with larceny of goods to introduce evidence of his declarations made after the property came into his possession, that he obtained them by finding.

The allegation of property in a complaint for an alleged larceny of goods is sustained, if the complainant at the time the larceny was committed, held possession of them under a loan from, or contract of sale with the owner.

The rulings and instructions of the judge of the superior court being in accordance with these principles, afford no legal ground of exception. Exceptions overruled.

Walton, Dickerson, Daneorth, Yirgin and Peters, JJ., concurred. Appleton, C. J., and Barrows, J., did not concur upon either point. They thought the declarations of Pettis admissible as tending to disprove any felonious intent, and that no property, general or special, in Charles A. Dalton was shown by the evidence.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.