Eaton v. Buswell
Eaton v. Buswell
Opinion of the Court
The statute of 1872, c. 85, § 12, provides
The language is clear. Its meaning is unmistakable. In the past snch action might have been maintained without such notice. In the future it shall not be.
The only notice produced fails in all the essential requirements of the statute. No claim whatever is set forth therein. The plaintiff is not indicated as the claimant. Payment is not demanded. A proposal to refer is no demand of payment. Nor is the want of such notice pleadable in abatement. The giving the required notice is essential to the plaintiff’s right to recover. It should be averred in the writ and proved in the trial.
Exceptions stistained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.