Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1891

Jordan v. Chase

Jordan v. Chase
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided July 1, 1891 · Haskell, Libbey, Peters, Virgin, Walton, Wihtehouse
83 Me. 540

Jordan v. Chase

Opinion of the Court

Walton, J.

This is a suit in equity presented at the same time and supported by the same evidence as the foregoing suit of Alley v. Chase. And for one of the same reasons-, — namely, *541the inherent weakness and utter insufficiency of the evidence in support of the facts on which the right to the relief asked for rests, — the same entry must be made.

O. P. Dutton, for complainant. Wiswell, King and Peters, B. E. Tracy, with them, for defendant.

Bill dismissed with costs.

Peters, C. J., Virgin, Libbey, Haskell and Wihtehouse, JJ., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.