Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1893

State v. Osgood

State v. Osgood
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided January 27, 1893 · Foster, Haskell, Libbey, Peters, Walton
85 Me. 288; 27 A. 154; 1893 Me. LEXIS 9

Counsel

Washington R. Prescott, County Attorney, for the State., Mortland and Johnson, for defendant.

State v. Osgood

Opinion of the Court

Haskell, J.

Revised Statutes, c. 17, § § 1, 2, among other things, provides that "all places used as houses of ill-fame” are common nuisances; and "whoever keeps and maintains such nuisance” shall be punished.

This indictment charges that the defendant did keep and maintain a certain place, to wit., &c., used as a house of ill-fame, to the common nuisance, &c., in the precise language of the statute, and is sufficient. State v. Stanley, 84 Maine, 555 ; Stale v. Ryan, 81 Maine, 107. Exceptions overruled.

Peters, C. J. ,Walton, Libbey and Foster, JJ., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.