Sanborn v. Gerald
Sanborn v. Gerald
91 Me. 366; 40 A. 67; 1898 Me. LEXIS 41
Sanborn v. Gerald
Opinion of the Court
Upon the trial the defendant justified the speaking of words charged to be slanderous as true. The presiding justice charged the jury: “Now the burden of this branch of the
Exceptions were sustained to the rule above given in a case from the same court in French v. Day, 89 Maine, 441. The opinion in that case disposes of this one.
Exceptions sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.