Hamet v. Pepperell Manufacturing Co.
Hamet v. Pepperell Manufacturing Co.
Opinion
Action on the case to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while operating in the' defendant’s mill certain carding machines. The plaintiff alleged that "the defendant, although well knowing the perils and dangers of the employment, utterly failed to give the said plaintiff any instructions or notice of the dangers and perils incident to said employment as aforesaid. Whereby and solely by reason of such failure on the part of the defendant to give the notice,” etc., etc., the plaintiff "was injured and suffered great pain,” etc., etc. Verdict for plaintiff for $895.83. The defendant moved for a new trial. The rescript, among other things, says : "The only question here presented is, was he (the plaintiff) entitled to instructions as to how to operate the machine in which he was at work, or, from his own knowledge and experience must he be deemed
Motion sustained. New trial granted.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jemal Hamet v. Pepperell Manufacturing Company
- Status
- Published