State v. Hahnel
State v. Hahnel
Opinion of the Court
This case came before this court on an agreed statement of facts from the Superior Court of Kennebec County. It involves the single question of the sufficiency of a complaint before the Hallowell Municipal Court under an ordinance of 'that city relating to plumbing adopted under Sec. 112, Chap. 19, R. S., which directs cities and towns having water and sewage systems to enact by-laws and ordinances regulating the installation, repair and inspection of pipes, faucets and other fixtures through which water or sewage is carried.
The complaint sets forth in substance that the respondent did plumbing work at said Hallowell, to wit, placed rain-water leaders on a certain building without first filing such plan and obtaining such permit.
The respondent contends that the acts charged in the complaint are not plumbing work within the meaning of the statute and ordinance. We think his contention must be sustained.
A plumber has been defined as one who fits dwellings and public buildings with tanks, pipes, traps, fittings and fixtures for the conveyance of gas, water and sewage. State v. Gardner, 58 Ohio St., 599. Plumbing, therefore, as indicated by Sec. 112 of Chap. 19, R. S., by which this ordinance was authorized, may be defined as the installing, altering or repairing of pipes, tanks, faucets, valves, and other fixtures through which gas, water, waste or sewage is conducted and carried.
True, the ordinance requires rain-water leaders to be properly trapped, but this must be construed as applying only when they enter hoúse-drains, soil-pipes or other waste-pipes; and it is only when they enter such waste-carrying pipes or drains that their installation and repair, or any part of, it can be regarded as plumbing within the meaning of the ordinance.
The complaint does not set out that the rain-water leaders installed by the respondent were connected with any waste, drain or soil-pipe. The installation of rain-water leaders unconnected with any waste, drain, or soil-pipe not being plumbing work within the meaning of the ordinance, no offense is charged in the complaint.
Entry must be,
Complaint dismissed.
Respondent discharged.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of Maine, (By Complaint) v. Fred Hahnel
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published