Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1935

Cummings v. Mason

Cummings v. Mason
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided February 11, 1935
133 Me. 513; 178 A. 927; 1935 Me. LEXIS 48

Cummings v. Mason

Opinion of the Court

None but issues of fact presented by the record in this case. The evidence is con-*514Aiding and that which apparently impressed the jury does not particularly appeal to us. But we can not say that the position of the defense is inherently improbable or necessarily inconsistent with truth. Were the case here on report the result might be different. Coming to use on general motion the mandate must be: Motion overruled.

Albert Beliveau, for plaintiff. George A. Hutchins, Peter M. MacDonald, for defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.