Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982

State v. Dupray

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided July 30, 1982 · Ette, Frey, God, McKusick, Nichols, Roberts, Viol

448 A.2d 328; 1982 Me. LEXIS 742 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Barnard (Me. 2001)
State v. Griffin (Me. 1982)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The defendant, David Dupray, appeals from his conviction of unlawful traf*329ficking in scheduled drugs, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (Supp. 1981), after a jury trial in Superior Court, Penobscot County. On appeal, defendant contends (1) that the trial justice’s instruction to the jury on the law of accomplice liability contained an error, and (2) that the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to support his conviction. Neither contention has merit. The trial justice’s instruction to the jury on accomplice liability, considered in its entirety, correctly stated Maine law despite the use of one outmoded term. Towle v. Aube, Me., 310 A.2d 259, 266 (1973). Second, a careful review of the record reveals that sufficient evidence was presented from which a rational jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty of unlawful trafficking in scheduled drugs. State v. Libby, Me., 435 A.2d 1075, 1078 (1981). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.