Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986

Bouchard v. Rozario

Bouchard v. Rozario
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided March 25, 1986 · Glassman, McKusick, Nichols, Nick, Roberts, Scolnik, Violette, Wathen, Wer
506 A.2d 1159; 1986 Me. LEXIS 738 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Bouchard v. Rozario

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

In this medical malpractice case, plaintiff Patrick Bouchard appeals from the summary judgment entered by the Superior Court (Penobscot County) in favor of defendant Dr. Rodney Rozario. The trial court certified its action as a final judgment pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 54(b), stating “Interest of justice — no good reason for delay.” At that time, however, a statute of limitations defense similar to that raised by defendant Rozario was being asserted by two of his codefendants and had not been adjudicated. We must dismiss plaintiff’s appeal for the lack of a final judgment, because the trial court failed to include a “brief reasoned statement supporting [its] decision to enter a Rule 54(b) certification” as required by Cole v. Peterson Realty, Inc., 432 A.2d 752, 757 (Me. 1981).

The entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

All concurring.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.