State v. Googoo

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
State v. Googoo, 525 A.2d 219 (Me. 1987)
1987 Me. LEXIS 724
Clifford, Glassman, McKusick, Roberts, Scolnik, Wathen

State v. Googoo

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Utilizing the procedure set forth in Rule 11(a)(2) of the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure, Gordon Googoo appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County) on his conditional pleas of guilty to violations of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2298 (Supp. 1986) (habitual offender) (Class C) and 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107 (1983) (possession of a schedule Y drug) (Class E). He contends that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the officer who arrested him lacked a reasonable, ar-ticulable basis to stop him. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the officer did indeed have a reasonable, articu-lable basis to stop the defendant. See State v. Collins, 479 A.2d 344, 346 (Me. 1984).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Maine v. Gordon GOOGOO
Status
Published