State v. LeClair

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
State v. LeClair, 534 A.2d 354 (Me. 1987)
1987 Me. LEXIS 846
Clifford, Glassman, McKusick, Nichols, Roberts, Scolnik, Wathen

State v. LeClair

Opinion of the Court

*355MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Paul LeClair appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court, Somerset County, entered after a jury waived trial finding him guilty of assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207(2) (Supp. 1986), and gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B) (Supp. 1986), challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and the admission of certain photographic evidence and expert medical testimony.

Our review of the record discloses that based on the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution any trier of fact rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offenses charged, State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me. 1985), and that the court properly admitted the photographs and expert medical testimony. See M.R.Evid. 401, 403 and 702; State v. Conlogue, 474 A.2d 167, 170-71 (Me. 1984); State v. Barnett, 480 A.2d 791, 794 (Me. 1984).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Maine v. Paul LeCLAIR
Status
Published