Davidson v. Bancroft

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Davidson v. Bancroft, 560 A.2d 13 (Me. 1989)
1989 Me. LEXIS 160
Clifford, Glassman, McKusick, Roberts, Wathen

Davidson v. Bancroft

Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Bancroft & Martin, the employer, appeals from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission affirming the Commissioner’s order denying a petition for review of incapacity. The employer argues that the Appellate Division erred in denying the petition in circumstances where at least a portion of the employee’s present incapacity results from a disease process unrelated to his former employment. In a case such as this, the employer is charged with the burden of proving that the work-related injury is no longer a causative factor in producing the employee’s incapacity. Brackett v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co., 559 A.2d 776 (Me. 1989). The record before us does not compel such a finding.

The entry is:

The decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission is affirmed.

It is ordered that the employer pay to the employee $750 for his counsel fees plus his reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for this appeal.

All concurring.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sherwood DAVIDSON v. BANCROFT & MARTIN
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published