Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1990

Wolfson v. Menardo

Wolfson v. Menardo
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided April 27, 1990 · Clifford, Collins, Glassman, Hornby, McKusick, Roberts, Wathen
573 A.2d 390; 1990 Me. LEXIS 132 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Wolfson v. Menardo

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because the defendants failed to appear at trial in the District Court (Bidde-ford, MacNichol, J.), we agree with the Superior Court (York County, Brodrick, J.) that they cannot later argue that they were not the proper parties to the lawsuit. Nor can the defendants raise for the first time on appeal their arguments that the amount billed them was unfair, that they should have been allotted a setoff for late delivery or that they believed that the trial would be postponed. The defendants should have presented all those arguments to the District Court. See Blanchette v. York Mut. Ins. Co., 455 A.2d 426, 428 (Me. 1983). Since this appeal is clearly frivolous, we award treble costs to the appellee under M.R.Civ.P. 76(f). See Gurschick v. Clark, 511 A.2d 36 (Me. 1986).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed. Treble costs shall be paid by appellants Anthony Menardo and Sal DeVito to appellee Donna 0. Wolf-son.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.