Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2003

Hale v. Antoniou

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Decided April 15, 2003 · Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Alexander, Calkins, Levy

2003 ME 52; 820 A.2d 586; 2003 Me. 52; 2003 Me. LEXIS 58

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

R.C. Moore, Inc. v. Les-Care Kitchens, Inc. (Me. 2007)
State v. Thongsavanh (Me. 2007)
Day v. State Tax Assessor (Me. 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Demetri Antoniou appeals from an order entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Humphrey, J.) denying his motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay judicial proceedings. The underlying action involves claims Michael and Edie Hale brought on behalf of their son, Jordan, against Antoniou for intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil assault. Antoniou asserts that the Superior Court erred in concluding that USA Hockey Inc.’s arbitration procedure did not govern the Hales’ claims. Because the Court is evenly divided, we affirm the judgment.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.