People v. Burk
People v. Burk
Opinion
April 8,1966, defendant pleaded guilty in Jackson county circuit court to charges of kidnaping 1 and assault with intent to commit the crime of rape. 2 He was not represented by counsel. April 15, 1966, he was sentenced to prison on both convictions. June 6,1966, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to set aside both convictions and to allow defendant to withdraw his pleas of guilty. Defendant appeals and urges as grounds for relief the same grounds asserted in the foregoing motion, namely: the trial court erred at arraignment by failing to afford defendant an opportunity to request counsel or by failing to inquire expressly whether defendant desired the court to appoint counsel and by failing to advise defendant of the minimum and maximum sentences involved prior to accepting his pleas of guilty.
There follows the pertinent part of the transcript on arraignment for the charge of kidnapping:
*694 “The Court. (Addressing the defendant) Tou understand what you are charged with Mr. Burk?
“The Defendant. Tes, Tour Honor.
“The Court. ' Tou did wilfully, maliciously and without lawful authority forcibly confine and imprison another person, to-wit: Judith Layman, within this State and against her will, is that right?
“The Defendant. Tes, Tour Honor.
“The Court. Tou understand that?
“The Defendant. Tes, Tour Honor.
“The Court. How do you wish to plead?
“The Defendant. Guilty.
“The Court. Tou wish to plead guilty, . . .
“The Defendant. Tes, sir. '
“The Court. (Continuing) ... is that right?
“The Defendant. Tes, sir.”
(The transcript on the arraignment for the charge of assault with intent to commit the crime of rape is so nearly identical to the foregoing that it is not repeated here.)
Thereafter the trial court did advise defendant of his right to counsel and to jury trial.
GCB 1963, 785.3(1) requires that the foregoing advice as to right to counsel and to a jury trial be given to defendant “before he is required to plead” and such requirement is mandatory, GCB 1963,785.3-(4). This defect in arraignment procedure requires that defendant’s pleas be set aside and obviates discussion of the other questions raised on this appeal.
Beversed and remanded.
Reference
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published