Michigan Court of Appeals, 1968

Winfrey v. Farhat

Michigan Court of Appeals · Decided May 31, 1968 · Lesinski, Moody, Quinn

11 Mich. App. 579; 161 N.W.2d 756; 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1333

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Winfrey v. Farhat (Mich. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs’ medical malpractice cause of action was dismissed by accelerated judgment based on tbe fact that the statute of limitations* had run as to their claim. Plaintiffs appeal.

The deposition of the plaintiff Iva M. Winfrey was properly received, and considered under GfCÉ 1963, 116.3, which provides in part that affidavits as well as other evidence may be considered on the motion.

The record on appeal contains uncontroverted facts which establish that plaintiff Iva M. Winfrey’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

Affirmed. Costs to appellees.

Lesinski, C. J., and Quinn and Moody, JJ., concurred.

CLS 1961, § 600.5805 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A. 5805).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.