Watson v. Diltz
Watson v. Diltz
Opinion of the Court
Defendant was tried by the court without a jury on a charge of paternity and found to be the father of plaintiff’s child. The complaint
CLS 1961, § 722.714(d), as amended by PA 1962, No 238 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 25.494[d]) requires the complaint to state time of conception “as near as possible.” This record discloses no fatal variance.
The finding by the trial judge that defendant is the father of plaintiff’s child is not clearly erroneous. OCR 1963, 517.1.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.