This case involves a sale by plaintiff to defendants of a parcel of land, on which plaintiff operated a “fish out” trout pond business, together with the pertinent equipment. A dispute arose as to the effective date of the sale. Plaintiff filed a complaint asking for rescission of the contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim asking for an accounting. After trial on the merits, the court denied rescission and rendered a judgment on the accounting. Defendants received less than they thought they should in the accounting, and appeal.

*28Upon de novo examination of the briefs and record we reach the same conclusions as did the trial judge.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.