Michigan Court of Appeals, 1968

City of Midland v. Surath

Michigan Court of Appeals · Decided December 20, 1968 · Burns, Corkin, Gillis

15 Mich. App. 49; 165 N.W.2d 853; 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 783

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Williams (Iowa 1970)
State v. Ross (Neb. 1971)
Rolland v. Michigan (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1970)
People v. Marsh (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Defendants appeal from a jury’s award of compensation for tbe tailing of tbeir property by eminent domain, alleging that tbe award is not witbin tbe range of the evidence.

An examination of tbe record and briefs discloses evidence to support tbe award.

:• Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

R. B. Burns, P. J., and J. H. Gillis and Corkin, JJ., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.