Defendant was found guilty by the court sitting without a jury of robbery armed * and sentenced to six to ten years in prison.

Two questions are raised by defendant on appeal.

The first is whether there was sufficient evidence to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. At trial the victim positively identified the defendant as being one of the two men who robbed her, at gun point, in her party store, and then exited by a side door when the police arrived. Two police officers identified the defendant as one of those exiting from the side door. One testified that he shot the defendant when chasing him and that he was apprehended by a bystander who observed the police in pursuit of the defendant. The bystander testified that after he caught the defendant, he stated to him, “Look, let me go and I’ll split the money with you.” The record contains ample evidence to sustain the court’s finding. People v. Arither Thomas (1967), 7 Mich App 103; People v. Walker (1969), 19 Mich App 569.

The second question is whether it was error for the defense counsel to waive closing argument where there was conflicting evidence. GCR 1963, 507.6 makes it very clear that parties may rest their case without a final argument; therefore, there was no error.

Affirmed.