Defendant was convicted by a jury for the offense of armed robbery. MCLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.797).

*122 While under direct examination, defendant blurted, “I realize that what they have me charged with carries life.” Whereupon, the prosecution, out of hearing of the jury, moved for a mistrial. The court did not rule on the motion and submitted the case to the jury.

The court instructed the jury that there was one of two verdicts they could return. They could either find the defendant guilty as charged, or not guilty.

Defendant appeals and raises two issues:

1. Does a trial judge’s failure to rule on a motion for a mistrial made by the prosection constitute reversible error?

2. Did the trial court commit reversible error in refusing defendant’s request for an instruction as to lesser included offenses?

We find no merit in defendant’s contention that the trial court’s failure to rule on the prosecution’s motion for a mistrial deprived defendant of his constitutional right to a trial by jury. In People v. Roland Robinson (1971), 30 Mich App 372, we held that if it was error at all it was harmless error for the trial court to fail to rule on the defendant’s motion for a mistrial. It does not appear the trial court’s failure to rule on the prosecution’s motion worked any miscarriage of justice.

A thorough search of the record reveals no evidence which would have supported a charge as to any lesser included offenses.

The requested instruction was properly refused by the trial judge. People v. Hearn (1958), 354 Mich 468; People v. Stevens (1968), 9 Mich App 531.

Affirmed.