People v. King
People v. King
37 Mich. App. 294; 194 N.W.2d 454
People v. King
Opinion of the Court
Defendant raises two issues for appellate review: (1) alleged improper cross-examination of a res gestae witness by the prosecutor, and (2) alleged improper cross-examination of defendant by the prosecutor. Neither of these alleged errors was preserved by objection at trial. We have, nevertheless, considered them and concluded that the defendant is not entitled to a new trial.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.