People v. King
People v. King
37 Mich. App. 439; 194 N.W.2d 717
People v. King
Opinion of the Court
Upon examination of the briefs and record it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Motion to affirm granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.