Michigan Court of Appeals, 1972

People v. McIntosh

Michigan Court of Appeals · Decided August 30, 1972 · Fitzgerald, Holbrook, Burns

202 N.W.2d 497; 42 Mich. App. 640; 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 976 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. McLeod (Mich. Ct. App. 1973)
People v. Hill (Mich. Ct. App. 1973)
People v. Prebble (Mich. Ct. App. 1973)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Fitzgerald, P. J.

Defendant was convicted, upon a plea of guilty, of committing larceny in a building, a violation of MCLA 750.360; MSA 28.592. He appeals as of right.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in taking into consideration defendant’s juvenile court record in imposing sentence. In light of recent decisions of this Court, we agree that this was error. MCLA 712A.23; MSA 27.3178(598.23); and People v McFarlin, 41 Mich App 116 (1972).

Because the trial court is at this point aware of defendant’s juvenile record and we would have no way of knowing if the resentencing process would be affected by this knowledge, we direct that a new presentence report which excludes reference to defendant’s juvenile record be obtained and that defendant be resentenced by a judge other than the sentencing judge herein.

The resolution set forth above renders the other issue raised by defendant moot.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

T. M. Burns, J., concurred. Holbrook, J.

(for affirmance). This writer is unable to agree with the majority opinion for reversal for the reasons stated in Justice O’Hara’s opinion in which this writer concurred in the case of People v Pence, 42 Mich App 215 (1972).

I would affirm the trial court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.