People v. Jackson
People v. Jackson
Opinion of the Court
During the within murder trial, the trial judge found Balfour Peisner, counsel for defendant, in contempt for willfully, persistently and repeatedly violating the ruling of the court, and fined him $150.
The trial judge is empowered to control proceedings in the court and, if necessary, to punish for contemptuous behavior.*
Review of the transcript reveals no abuse of discretion here. The contempt finding of the trial judge was fully supported in the record. The conduct in question took place during a jury trial, in the presence of both the trial judge and the jury, and it interfered with the progress of that trial. Immediate punishment properly was imposed by the trial judge outside of the jury’s presence.
Affirmed, with costs.
MCLA 600.1701; MSA 27A.1701. In re Burns, 19 Mich App 525; 173 NW2d 1 (1969).
People v Matish, 384 Mich 568; 184 NW2d 915 (1971).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- IN THE MATTER OF THE CONTEMPT OF BALFOUR PEISNER (PEOPLE v. JACKSON)
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published