Mielke v. MICH. MILLERS MUTUAL INS. CO.
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (Mich. Ct. App. 1978)
- LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (Mich. 1981)
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (Mich. 1979)
- Greene v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (Mich. Ct. App. 1978)
- Smith v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange (Mich. Ct. App. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
MIELKE
v.
MICHIGAN MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Keller, Keller, Creager, Kosick & Rochau, for plaintiff.
Butzbaugh, Page, Butzbaugh & Dewane, for defendant.
Before: M.F. CAVANAGH, P.J., and BRONSON and M.J. KELLY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals as of right from an order granting plaintiff's summary judgment motion on the basis that the governmental benefits set-off provision of Michigan's no-fault insurance act, MCLA 500.3109(1); MSA 24.13109(1), is unconstitutional. Defendant, plaintiff's insurer, reduced payments due plaintiff by the amount of Social Security survivor's benefits received by plaintiff.
This case is controlled by Pollock v Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Co, 79 Mich App 218; 261 NW2d 554 (1977). Pollock involved a set-off for workmen's compensation benefits. Its reasoning is equally applicable to a set-off for Social Security benefits.
We also note that Richardson v Belcher, 404 US 78; 92 S Ct 254; 30 L Ed 2d 231 (1971), is inapposite, as that case found a rational basis for a Federal set-off statute in the need to preserve state workmen's compensation programs, a consideration not applicable to the case at bar.
Affirmed. Costs to appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.