ON REMAND

This appeal, involving the medical-malpractice cap on noneconomic damages found in MCL 600.1483 (damages cap), is before us on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court “for consideration of the constitutional issues raised by plaintiff, which were not resolved by the Court of Appeals in light of its analysis of the statutory issue.” Jenkins v Patel, 471 Mich 158, 174; 684 NW2d 346 (2004). The Supreme Court reversed our earlier opinion, holding, contrary to our conclusion, that the damages cap does apply to wrongful death actions where the underlying claim is medical malpractice. Defendants’ arguments regarding the alleged excessiveness of the $ 10 million verdict are no longer pertinent in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling applying the damages cap. Id. at 174. Therefore, the only issues to resolve concern plaintiff’s arguments that MCL 600.1483 is unconstitutional because it violates the right to a jury trial, Const 1963, art 1, § 14; the separation of powers doctrine, Const 1963, art 3, § 2; and equal protection guarantees, US Const, Am XIV and Const 1963, art 1, § 2.

Pursuant to the majority opinion in Zdrojewski v Murphy, 254 Mich App 50; 657 NW2d 721 (2002), and the reasoning of a majority of our current Supreme Court in Phillips v Mirac, Inc, 470 Mich 415; 685 NW2d 174 (2004), we are compelled to conclude that all of *510 plaintiffs constitutional arguments fail. 1 Accordingly, we remand to the trial court for entry of judgment consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding and our holding today.

Reversed and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction.