Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg. Co. v. Dailey
Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg. Co. v. Dailey
703 N.W.2d 496; 266 Mich. App. 801
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Liss v. Lewiston-Richards, Inc (Mich. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
v.
Steven DAILEY and Janine Dailey, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
George H. Presley and ABN-AMRO, d/b/a Standard Federal Bank, Defendants, and
Jeffry R. Hartman, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
Court of Appeals of Michigan.
ORDER
The Court orders that a special panel shall not be convened pursuant to MCR *497 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and Forton v. Laszar, 239 Mich.App. 711, 609 N.W.2d 850 (2000), lv. den. 463 Mich. 969, 622 N.W.2d 61 (2001), for the reason that the conflict is not outcome-determinative. MCR 7.215(J)(3)(a).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.