Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Michigan /Cases /Michigan Court of Appeals /

2009

208 Michigan Court of Appeals opinions from 2009.

  • People v. Horton 767 N.W.2d 672, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Alken-Ziegler, Inc v. Hague 767 N.W.2d 668, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Truckor v. Erie Township 771 N.W.2d 1, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • In re Nestorovski Estate 769 N.W.2d 720, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Anglers of AuSable, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality 770 N.W.2d 359, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • People v. Sadows 768 N.W.2d 93, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Transou v. City of Pontiac 769 N.W.2d 281, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • In re Anjoski 770 N.W.2d 1, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Hudson v. Mathers 770 N.W.2d 883, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Shaw v. City of Ecorse 770 N.W.2d 31, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Tevis v. AMEX ASSURANCE CO. 770 N.W.2d 16, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Mericka v. Department of Community Health 770 N.W.2d 24, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • In re Contempt of Henry 765 N.W.2d 44, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Burise v. City of Pontiac 766 N.W.2d 311, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Superior Hotels, LLC v. Mackinaw Township 765 N.W.2d 31, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Robinson v. City of Lansing 765 N.W.2d 25, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Corporan v. Henton 766 N.W.2d 903, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • In re Attorney General for Investigative Subpoenas 766 N.W.2d 675, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • People v. Hill 766 N.W.2d 17, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • People v. Murphy (On Remand) 766 N.W.2d 303, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Lanigan v. Huron Valley Hospital, Inc 766 N.W.2d 896, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • People v. Zujko 765 N.W.2d 897, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Mason v. City of Menominee 766 N.W.2d 888, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • People v. Wells 760 N.W.2d 488, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Autoalliance International, Inc v. Department of Treasury 766 N.W.2d 1, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Bandeen v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board 766 N.W.2d 10, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Cooper v. Jenkins 766 N.W.2d 671, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • McIntosh v. McIntosh 768 N.W.2d 325, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Manske v. Department of Treasury 766 N.W.2d 300, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • 4041-49 W Maple Condominium Ass'n v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. 768 N.W.2d 88, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Oneida Charter Township v. City of Grand Ledge 766 N.W.2d 291, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Greater Bethesda Healing Springs Ministry v. Evangel Builders & Construction Managers, LLC 766 N.W.2d 874, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Amerisure Insurance v. Plumb 766 N.W.2d 878, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Roberts v. TITAN INS. CO.(ON RECON.) 764 N.W.2d 304, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Tkachik v. Mandeville 764 N.W.2d 318, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Roberts v. Titan Insurance 282 Mich. App. 801, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Pierron v. Pierron 765 N.W.2d 345, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Oakland County v. OAKLAND COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASS'N 765 N.W.2d 373, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • People v. Henderson 765 N.W.2d 619, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Green v. Ziegelman 767 N.W.2d 660, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • PONTIAC FOOD CTR. v. Dep't of Community Health 766 N.W.2d 42, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • People v. Smith 772 N.W.2d 428, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Fisher & Co. v. Department of Treasury 769 N.W.2d 740, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Gadigian v. City of Taylor 774 N.W.2d 352, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Martin v. Ledingham 774 N.W.2d 328, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of Education 772 N.W.2d 784, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Parent v. Parent 762 N.W.2d 553, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • In re Project Cost & Special Assessment Roll for Chappel Dam 762 N.W.2d 192, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • New Properties, Inc v. George D Newpower, Jr, Inc 762 N.W.2d 178, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
  • Avink v. SMG 761 N.W.2d 826, (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑