Michigan Court of Appeals, 2015

Huntington National Bank v. Auto Sports Unlimited Inc

Huntington National Bank v. Auto Sports Unlimited Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals · Decided August 18, 2015

Huntington National Bank v. Auto Sports Unlimited Inc

Opinion

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, UNPUBLISHED August 18, 2015 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v No. 320905 Ottawa Circuit Court AUTO SPORTS UNLIMITED, INC, LC No. 11-002488-CK FAARGSOB, LLC, ROADMASTER ASU, LLC, SUZANNE LEE BOSGRAAF, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the SCOTT T. BOSGRAAF TRUST and the SUZANNE LEE BOSGRAAF TRUST, and AMICUS MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants, and SCOTT T. BOSGRAAF, Individually and as Co- Trustee of the SCOTT T. BOSGRAAF TRUST and the SUZANNE LEE BOSGRAAF TRUST, Defendant-Appellant, and FIRST FINANCIAL BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee, and HTSTS, LC, JOLDERSMA, INC., SCOTT JOLDERSMA, and TERRY JOLDERSMA, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

Before: TALBOT, P.J., and KELLY and SERVITTO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

-1- Scott T. Bosgraaf, in his individual and representative capacities, appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting summary disposition with regard to various claims in favor of First Financial Bank, N.A. (“First Financial”). We affirm.

The facts underlying the instant appeal, as well as the disputed trial court decision and issues raised from that decision, are identical to those discussed in sections I, II, and III(A) of this Court’s opinion in First Financial Bank, NA v Bosgraaf, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued August 11, 2015 (Docket No. 320881). For the same reasons discussed in First Financial Bank, NA, we conclude that the contentions of error raised in this appeal lack merit, and accordingly, affirm the trial court’s decision.

Affirmed.

/s/ Michael J. Talbot /s/ Kirsten Frank Kelly /s/ Deborah A. Servitto

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.