Michigan Court of Appeals, 2017

Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc

Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals · Decided January 17, 2017

Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc

Opinion

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Michael J. Talbot, C.J.

Stenzel v Best Buy Co, Inc. Presiding Judge Docket No . 328804 All Court of Appeals Judges LC No. 14-000527-NO

The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(1) to resolve the conflict between this case and Williams v Arbor Home, Inc, 254 Mich App 439; 656 NW2d 873 (2002), vacated in part on other grounds 469 Mich 898 (2003).

The Court further orders that pa1t II(C) of the opm1on m this case, released on December 22, 2016, is vacated in its entirety. MCR 7.215(J)(5).

Appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk's certification of this order. Appellees may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the service of appellant's brief.

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on

JAN 1 7 2017 Date

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.